Skip to main content

England v Wales: Who teaches Maths better?

England V Wales: Who teaches Maths better?

Times are changing in Wales, there is a new Curriculum focus and in Maths there are 5 proficiencies that the government want to see. Here's my take as a new HOD crossing the border from England.

The Welsh government have overhauled the curriculum and not just in Maths. They have identified key statements of what matters and laid out principles for progressing in each subject. 

Maths in every country is the same though surely....

Well yes... we still focus on Number, Algebra, Geometry and Statistics.
But also no....in Wales it is mandatory to use their 5 proficiencies to progress students in Maths. This isn't an explicit thing in England.

The 5 proficiencies are: conceptual understanding, fluency, logical thinking, strategic competence and communication with symbols

Lots of big words. But if you dive deeper into the detail that the Welsh government provides on each of them it is no different to what the NCETM in England recommend with their 5 big ideas. 



It is obviously a mindset shift for some teachers who may have been teaching purely procedures. To me, call it what you want, 5 big ideas, 5 proficiencies. It is just good maths teaching. 

I'll admit I don't like the wording the Welsh government use. I'm a simple man so simple words work better for me! But I do think Wales emphasises algebraic understanding slightly more with the idea of communicating with symbols, justifications and proof. 

I don't like, and have never liked the idea of any of these lists as being a tick box or things to explicitly plan for. Like everything else in Maths, it is all interconnected. You need to understand concepts to support with logical thinking. Students need to be fluent as well as being able to communicate effectively. 

In summary, I like that both in England and Wales we are explicitly naming what good Maths teaching should look like. Just look at the work of Doug Lemov. Putting a name to something allows you to focus on it and directly improve it. It gives departments areas to focus on, but let's not isolate ideas/proficiencies or make it a tick box exercise, they are all interconnected and needed for students to progress in Maths. 

Popular posts from this blog

📝 Weekly Report #21

The trainee teacher in our department has started to teach my Year 10 group this week. It has taken me back to when I was training and the struggles that I had and the feedback my mentor would give me. One thing I didn't consider back then was how the class teacher feels who I was taking over from.  I know that as a trainee I was no where near being an amazing teacher but over time I have continually improved. So it has been a struggle for me to allow the trainee to teach my class thinking that there would be aspects that I know I could deliver much better. On the flip side of this it has been great to learn from him by watching him teach and being able to give small steps to improve for next time. The initial focus has been on general pedagogy, e.g. use of questioning, planning for misconceptions etc. It's made me reflect on my own teaching ensuring I don't just talk it, I walk the walk too! I've also enjoyed seeing the improvements he has been able to make lesson on l...

📝 Weekly Report #7

👨‍🏫 Teaching: Colin Hegarty has recently been posting questions from Sparx and discussing which questions are better to use and why. Check out some of his tweets here . It got me thinking about the questions and examples I use in my own teaching, in particular around the numbers I choose to use. It highlights the need to carefully craft questions to pull out misconceptions and ensure students are learning the concept correctly rather than getting to the answer by chance. Unfortunately time is precious and so it is very difficult to do this for every question in every lesson I teach. Having said that, I have made a conscious effort to ensure the examples I am using are there on purpose and can be used to highlight key concepts so students can generalise ideas more easily. Will definitely look into this more as part of my NCETM course throughout the year. Definitely given me lots to think about to improve my teaching.  🔊 Listen: High performance podcast with Mark Cavendish. Mark t...

Ratio Tables: Why you need to use them?

Only 36% of students were able to answer the question on the right. Whereas 75% of students were able to correctly answer the problem on the left. (7) Why? What's the big difference?  Students are more likely to relate values between objects (left question) than within an object (right question). (7) A similar issue comes up in the questions below. 91% getting the bottom question correct, relating 11 people to 33 people. Whereas only 51% answered the top question correctly.  Students often struggle to see all of the multiplicative links between and within values. One of the misconceptions my own students had with the right 'L' question was that the answer was 45. They had added 13cm because 8 + 13 = 21 on the base of the 'L'. "Young children tend to see multiplication additively" Dietmar Kuchemann   DfE suggests teaching multiplication as repeated addition, with arrays, in Yr2. Yr3 scaling is introduced but after that isn't mentioned again. It is as...