Skip to main content

Connectionist teaching

I recently read the study by Askew et el (1997) called Effective teachers of numeracy in primary schools: teachers beliefs practices and pupils learning and it introduced me to a term called connectionist teaching. Connectionist teachers have "beliefs based around both valuing pupils methods and teaching strategies with an emphasis on establishing connections within mathematics." The study compared this style of teaching with discovery teaching and transmission teaching. It found that teachers with a strong connectionist orientation are more likely to have classes that made greater gains than those classes of teachers with strong discovery or transmission orientations. 

So what do connectionist teachers do?

According to the study, connectionist teachers lessons are generally characterised by a high degree of focused discussion. These discussions were carefully monitored to bring out key strategies and ideas on the concept being taught. Pupils were expected to be able to explain their thinking process rather than just giving an answer to a question. 

Connectionist teachers make "connections within mathematics." For example showing how expanding brackets in algebra has similarities to multiplying integers, rather than trying to link to real life contexts. I believe the most effective way of making those connections is through showing multiple representations. By using a consistent representation for multiple topics, students are able to notice similar methods and strategies. Below are a few examples from twitter of using representations to show a concept. 

Visually solving equations using algebra counters and a vector model. @MEJ0778 
Gattegno charts showing the effect of multiplying by 10, 2 and then linking to indices within algebra. @MrACrampton

Making use of bar modelling on mathsbot.com to find a fraction of an amount. Could also link to sharing in a ratio.
I don't think we should overwhelm students with 5 or 6 representations for the same thing however if we carefully choose them we can use it to enhance understanding and make connections between topics. 

Connectionist teaching is not a complete contrast to discovery or transmission but embodies the best of both of them in its acknowledgment of the role of both the teacher and the pupils in lessons. I like to think of it as being teacher directed as opposed to teacher led or pupil led. 




Popular posts from this blog

📝 Weekly Report #21

The trainee teacher in our department has started to teach my Year 10 group this week. It has taken me back to when I was training and the struggles that I had and the feedback my mentor would give me. One thing I didn't consider back then was how the class teacher feels who I was taking over from.  I know that as a trainee I was no where near being an amazing teacher but over time I have continually improved. So it has been a struggle for me to allow the trainee to teach my class thinking that there would be aspects that I know I could deliver much better. On the flip side of this it has been great to learn from him by watching him teach and being able to give small steps to improve for next time. The initial focus has been on general pedagogy, e.g. use of questioning, planning for misconceptions etc. It's made me reflect on my own teaching ensuring I don't just talk it, I walk the walk too! I've also enjoyed seeing the improvements he has been able to make lesson on l...

📝 Weekly Report #7

👨‍🏫 Teaching: Colin Hegarty has recently been posting questions from Sparx and discussing which questions are better to use and why. Check out some of his tweets here . It got me thinking about the questions and examples I use in my own teaching, in particular around the numbers I choose to use. It highlights the need to carefully craft questions to pull out misconceptions and ensure students are learning the concept correctly rather than getting to the answer by chance. Unfortunately time is precious and so it is very difficult to do this for every question in every lesson I teach. Having said that, I have made a conscious effort to ensure the examples I am using are there on purpose and can be used to highlight key concepts so students can generalise ideas more easily. Will definitely look into this more as part of my NCETM course throughout the year. Definitely given me lots to think about to improve my teaching.  🔊 Listen: High performance podcast with Mark Cavendish. Mark t...

Ratio Tables: Why you need to use them?

Only 36% of students were able to answer the question on the right. Whereas 75% of students were able to correctly answer the problem on the left. (7) Why? What's the big difference?  Students are more likely to relate values between objects (left question) than within an object (right question). (7) A similar issue comes up in the questions below. 91% getting the bottom question correct, relating 11 people to 33 people. Whereas only 51% answered the top question correctly.  Students often struggle to see all of the multiplicative links between and within values. One of the misconceptions my own students had with the right 'L' question was that the answer was 45. They had added 13cm because 8 + 13 = 21 on the base of the 'L'. "Young children tend to see multiplication additively" Dietmar Kuchemann   DfE suggests teaching multiplication as repeated addition, with arrays, in Yr2. Yr3 scaling is introduced but after that isn't mentioned again. It is as...