Skip to main content

Can task design link concepts?

If we created similar looking tasks for concepts, can they help students make links? 

Most questions we give students look like this.

1) 37 + 18 = 
2) 45 + 29 = 
3) 89 + 24 = 
4) 65 + 72 =
5) 34 + 23 =
6) 92 + 52 =
7) 23 + 10 =
8) 67 +29 = 
9) 16 + 44 =
10) 34 + 92 =


Even if we vary the questions effectively and seek to learn something about the underlying concept, some students may not realise that adding integers is the same process as collecting like terms and that it is also the same as adding decimals. Or that expanding brackets is the same process as multiplying integers or fractions. Could making the tasks we give to students similar, encourage these links? 

The classic 10/20 questions given to students can potentially take time to plan/find and select for your students. Then you may need to think about ways of extending learning or offering further support to weaker students. There is lots to plan for a section of deliberate practice. Surely there must be a more efficient and effective way?

Whenever I look to change my teaching practice it must be 1. Beneficial to the students and 2. Be manageable for me to actually plan and adapt in lesson. I like to think of the stages of the task as either doing or undoing, from Mathematical Tasks by Chris McGrane and Mark McCourt.

Addition Using Pyramids

Stage 1 - Doing

This would be where students are actually doing the addition task, so adding for example adding together two integers to find the value of the block above. I have even put an example looking at perimeter of shapes where you could leave the block above up to the imagination of students as to what shape it would produce.




We can obviously decide on the bottom row ourselves to make this easier or harder to start with. Students can then do multiple addition calculations to reach the top number. As a teacher you have only had to think of 3/4 numbers depending on how wide you make your pyramid. 

Stage 2 - Undoing

I like the idea of doing and undoing style task so incorporating subtraction into addition. So we could from this stage take the top answer of ... and ask students to start with the top number and fill in the gaps below. 

What would an easy one look like? 

What would a hard one look like? 

Could you include decimals/negatives etc?

Again, no extra work for the teacher but it could encourage some nice discussions about starting with certain numbers e.g. all odd numbers do we get an odd answer every time? Primes, is there a pattern? 1 digit numbers, do we always get a 3 digit number? Etc





I think the pyramid idea works well for addition because of the building blocks idea. It may even be worth using a frequency tree format so that we can link it to frequency trees, number partitioning in place value etc. 

It makes me think about what other processes/concepts could we use a similar format for? And would this improve the connections that students make between topics? One thing I do know is that it can make planning easier and encourage students to think hard about their answers in particular when 'undoing' a task.

Popular posts from this blog

📝 Weekly Report #21

The trainee teacher in our department has started to teach my Year 10 group this week. It has taken me back to when I was training and the struggles that I had and the feedback my mentor would give me. One thing I didn't consider back then was how the class teacher feels who I was taking over from.  I know that as a trainee I was no where near being an amazing teacher but over time I have continually improved. So it has been a struggle for me to allow the trainee to teach my class thinking that there would be aspects that I know I could deliver much better. On the flip side of this it has been great to learn from him by watching him teach and being able to give small steps to improve for next time. The initial focus has been on general pedagogy, e.g. use of questioning, planning for misconceptions etc. It's made me reflect on my own teaching ensuring I don't just talk it, I walk the walk too! I've also enjoyed seeing the improvements he has been able to make lesson on l...

📝 Weekly Report #7

👨‍🏫 Teaching: Colin Hegarty has recently been posting questions from Sparx and discussing which questions are better to use and why. Check out some of his tweets here . It got me thinking about the questions and examples I use in my own teaching, in particular around the numbers I choose to use. It highlights the need to carefully craft questions to pull out misconceptions and ensure students are learning the concept correctly rather than getting to the answer by chance. Unfortunately time is precious and so it is very difficult to do this for every question in every lesson I teach. Having said that, I have made a conscious effort to ensure the examples I am using are there on purpose and can be used to highlight key concepts so students can generalise ideas more easily. Will definitely look into this more as part of my NCETM course throughout the year. Definitely given me lots to think about to improve my teaching.  🔊 Listen: High performance podcast with Mark Cavendish. Mark t...

Ratio Tables: Why you need to use them?

Only 36% of students were able to answer the question on the right. Whereas 75% of students were able to correctly answer the problem on the left. (7) Why? What's the big difference?  Students are more likely to relate values between objects (left question) than within an object (right question). (7) A similar issue comes up in the questions below. 91% getting the bottom question correct, relating 11 people to 33 people. Whereas only 51% answered the top question correctly.  Students often struggle to see all of the multiplicative links between and within values. One of the misconceptions my own students had with the right 'L' question was that the answer was 45. They had added 13cm because 8 + 13 = 21 on the base of the 'L'. "Young children tend to see multiplication additively" Dietmar Kuchemann   DfE suggests teaching multiplication as repeated addition, with arrays, in Yr2. Yr3 scaling is introduced but after that isn't mentioned again. It is as...