Skip to main content

Can task design link concepts?

If we created similar looking tasks for concepts, can they help students make links? 

Most questions we give students look like this.

1) 37 + 18 = 
2) 45 + 29 = 
3) 89 + 24 = 
4) 65 + 72 =
5) 34 + 23 =
6) 92 + 52 =
7) 23 + 10 =
8) 67 +29 = 
9) 16 + 44 =
10) 34 + 92 =


Even if we vary the questions effectively and seek to learn something about the underlying concept, some students may not realise that adding integers is the same process as collecting like terms and that it is also the same as adding decimals. Or that expanding brackets is the same process as multiplying integers or fractions. Could making the tasks we give to students similar, encourage these links? 

The classic 10/20 questions given to students can potentially take time to plan/find and select for your students. Then you may need to think about ways of extending learning or offering further support to weaker students. There is lots to plan for a section of deliberate practice. Surely there must be a more efficient and effective way?

Whenever I look to change my teaching practice it must be 1. Beneficial to the students and 2. Be manageable for me to actually plan and adapt in lesson. I like to think of the stages of the task as either doing or undoing, from Mathematical Tasks by Chris McGrane and Mark McCourt.

Addition Using Pyramids

Stage 1 - Doing

This would be where students are actually doing the addition task, so adding for example adding together two integers to find the value of the block above. I have even put an example looking at perimeter of shapes where you could leave the block above up to the imagination of students as to what shape it would produce.




We can obviously decide on the bottom row ourselves to make this easier or harder to start with. Students can then do multiple addition calculations to reach the top number. As a teacher you have only had to think of 3/4 numbers depending on how wide you make your pyramid. 

Stage 2 - Undoing

I like the idea of doing and undoing style task so incorporating subtraction into addition. So we could from this stage take the top answer of ... and ask students to start with the top number and fill in the gaps below. 

What would an easy one look like? 

What would a hard one look like? 

Could you include decimals/negatives etc?

Again, no extra work for the teacher but it could encourage some nice discussions about starting with certain numbers e.g. all odd numbers do we get an odd answer every time? Primes, is there a pattern? 1 digit numbers, do we always get a 3 digit number? Etc





I think the pyramid idea works well for addition because of the building blocks idea. It may even be worth using a frequency tree format so that we can link it to frequency trees, number partitioning in place value etc. 

It makes me think about what other processes/concepts could we use a similar format for? And would this improve the connections that students make between topics? One thing I do know is that it can make planning easier and encourage students to think hard about their answers in particular when 'undoing' a task.

Popular posts from this blog

Literacy in Maths

I'm a Maths teacher, I teach numbers. Why is Literacy so important for me? Well….here's why: "Literacy is fundamental for success in school and later life. Students who cannot read, write and communicate effectively are highly unlikely to access the challenging academic curriculum in secondary school and are more likely to have poor educational outcomes across all subjects." (Link 3)  Unfortunately there are a lot of Maths teachers who believe (wrongly) that literacy is a thing that the English department do. They see it as a tick box for observations. Rather than being an essential component of students being able to learn maths.  -  So what does it look like in Maths? Answer the question: Blindle 4x + 6 Are you able to do it?  This is the challenge a lot of students face in Mathematics. Subject specific vocabulary can seem really confusing to a lot of students. Understanding what a keyword is asking of students is often the hardest part of a question and can hold s...

πŸ“ Weekly Report #33

This week I listened to a really good podcast episode from Greg McKeown called Where am I wrong? In it he talks about a really effective method to have deeper discussions on what is important.  Write down/say the 3-5 issues/priorities you think there are as well as the cost/consequence of them. Then just simply ask where am I wrong? It starts the conversation off with the other person talking and getting their points across. You can then get that shared understanding about what needs to be done and why.  It got me thinking about other areas this could be useful for e.g. dealing with conflicts, leading departments/teams, pitching a new initiative. I am going to start doing this in some of these scenarios as I think we can have more productive conversations from it.  Have a listen to the episode here .  πŸ”Š Listen: Alan Stein Jr on the Modern Wisdom podcast discussing high performance and overcoming stress. He talks about thinking like an athlete with your work and impr...

πŸ“ Weekly Report #9

πŸ‘¨β€πŸ« Teaching : Have done a lot of thinking this week about the tasks I set students. Mark McCourt put a wonderful tweet out listing the different parts of a learning sequence for students. See tweet here . It nicely puts into words some of the ideas I was thinking about myself. I then also listened to Craig Barton's podcast with Tom Francombe and they spoke about giving students tasks that distract their attention but have them practicing the skill taught in the lesson. From this I have been writing tasks and noticing other tweets with exercises on that distract student thinking. So for the next half term one of my focus points is on creating and regularly using these distraction tasks in lesson.  πŸ”Š Listen : Walter Isaacson on the Knowledge project discussing Creativity. He talks about how some of the most creative people of all time, Davinci etc, immersed themselves in learning as much as they could and then linking things together. So tying the art knowledge to his engineering...