Skip to main content

Thinking deeply about what we teach

We are reviewing our year 7 curriculum currently and refining it in preparation for students to come to secondary school a lot weaker than in previous years because of the sheer amount of school time students have missed out on.As part of this I have looked at how we feed forward some of the representations and teaching that we advocate, linking the current topic to future ideas. Talking about why we are promoting using a method or representation and where that then goes on to in their future maths career. 

Not only can this benefit students but it also shows teachers the many ways that we can make links within maths and that something that we may show when teaching place value is also relevant when we look at scales on a graph or explaining why we want to push the use of number partitioning so that when we look at multiplication it can make things easier for us to calculate. These have to be carefuly selected and incorporated though, using a particular representation/method has to serve a purpose. I feel there is no need in doing something if there isnt a particular reason for it and doesn't help me, as a teacher or a student, in the future. 

Below is an example of some of the ideas I had. 

- Number partitioning - to be used to make addition and subtraction calculstions easier. Also used with methods of multiplication.
-Gattegno Charts - can be used to link to standard form and index laws
- Completing Number lines and intervals - can be used with scales on a graph, averages, moves nicely into rounding
- Rounding - links to estimating calculations and checking answers

This is by no means an exhaustive list but as I was writing it it made me realise that a topic like place value can have so much depth to it and we can potentially teach it for weeks if not months exploring lots of concepts around it. When I first started teaching Place Value, it was a 1 or 2 lesson thing that I would get through before I got on to the 'cool', 'tough' maths. But now my eyes are wide open to the endless possibilities and avenues that I could go down with my students. What i will say though is that, we as teachers need to upskill ourselves so that we can better enrich our students with these topics that, when you truly think about it, make such a huge difference to future understanding. 

Place value was a classic that I thought was just for bottom set students and the higher attaining students just needed to answer 1 or 2 questions on it to show me they knew what it was. Thats not mastering a topic though, I've looked at using different number base systems, going into number partitioning, using gattegno charts etc to ensure I am stretching the concept for high attaining students. This continues to be a development for me but one that I am looking forward to adding to my repertoire. 

Popular posts from this blog

📝 Weekly Report #21

The trainee teacher in our department has started to teach my Year 10 group this week. It has taken me back to when I was training and the struggles that I had and the feedback my mentor would give me. One thing I didn't consider back then was how the class teacher feels who I was taking over from.  I know that as a trainee I was no where near being an amazing teacher but over time I have continually improved. So it has been a struggle for me to allow the trainee to teach my class thinking that there would be aspects that I know I could deliver much better. On the flip side of this it has been great to learn from him by watching him teach and being able to give small steps to improve for next time. The initial focus has been on general pedagogy, e.g. use of questioning, planning for misconceptions etc. It's made me reflect on my own teaching ensuring I don't just talk it, I walk the walk too! I've also enjoyed seeing the improvements he has been able to make lesson on l...

Equivalent Fractions with Ratio Tables

The following is a slide taken from NCETM Checkpoints. I was happy with the fraction pair on the right but the left stumped me! Then I had that 'aha' moment!  What I used to do I never used to teach equivalent fractions like the one on the left to my classes. I would just use arrows to multiply both numerator and denominator to find an equivalent fraction, very similar to the fractions on the right.  The issue with this though is, like me, students don't necessarily see all of the multiplicative relationships between the fractions as well as within the fraction. They are missing that key knowledge to support them answering the first pair of fractions.   What I do now Ratio tables allow students to see those multiplicative links. By doing this it makes questions like the checkpoints task much easier for students to do.  Disclaimer: this isn't the only way I teach equivalent fractions. I also show students how prime factors can also help us. There will be a future...

Ratio Tables: Why you need to use them?

Only 36% of students were able to answer the question on the right. Whereas 75% of students were able to correctly answer the problem on the left. (7) Why? What's the big difference?  Students are more likely to relate values between objects (left question) than within an object (right question). (7) A similar issue comes up in the questions below. 91% getting the bottom question correct, relating 11 people to 33 people. Whereas only 51% answered the top question correctly.  Students often struggle to see all of the multiplicative links between and within values. One of the misconceptions my own students had with the right 'L' question was that the answer was 45. They had added 13cm because 8 + 13 = 21 on the base of the 'L'. "Young children tend to see multiplication additively" Dietmar Kuchemann   DfE suggests teaching multiplication as repeated addition, with arrays, in Yr2. Yr3 scaling is introduced but after that isn't mentioned again. It is as...