Skip to main content

📝 Weekly Report #18

This week I've been having conversations with the leadership team about the Maths curriculum. Our discussions were based on two questions:

1. To what extent does the subject leader and their department ensure that a high-quality subject curriculum exists for all pupils?
2. To what extent does the subject leader and other department responsibility holders assure themselves that there is a high-quality curriculum for all pupils? 

Ensure
In our department we have an overall scheme of work that we follow. We've recently changed our Key Stage 3 scheme of work to focus mainly on Number in Year 7 and Algebra in Year 8. This has come from learning from some of the most successful, similar schools to us. It is also based from experience knowing how important and strong understanding of algebra and number is to everything else in Maths. 
 
We then turn that larger scheme of work into smaller sub units e.g. multiplication, indices, fractions etc. These units have a number of objectives assigned to them that develop over time. We do set students by attainment however due to the nature of our scheme of work all students are studying the same topics at the same time. The difference in class will be the depth they are able to get to. 

We utilise a weekly progress check test that is centrally planned so teachers understand the minimum level we need students to understand in order to succeed in this topic. These tests are not set in stone though, teachers are expected to adapt them to suit the needs of the students in front of them by either adding more challenging questions or more retrieval based questions or more accessible questions.

At our school we start every lesson with a retrieval quiz. In Maths six of the ten questions are centrally planned, the other four are up to the teachers discretion. I use the last four to test students knowledge from the last lesson. We centrally plan these quizzes so that it reduces workload but also ensures students are regularly retrieving key skills. For example, in Year 7 we have a focus on knowing our times tables fluently so every quiz has a times tables question in. This then leads teachers to chant the times tables with their class each lesson to help improve their fluency. 

Another way we help ensure the curriculum is of a high standard for all is by the centrally planned resources/lessons that are shared. Questions, examples, representations etc are all shared across our department so that teachers, even non specialists, have a framework to build their lessons from. This isn't prescribing the exact lesson but instead giving a suggestion that includes rich tasks to develop depth of knowledge rather than pushing on to the next topic. Teachers will tweak these resources to better suit the students in front of them. 

These are some off the ways we are ensuring our curriculum is of a high quality for all pupils. In next week's report I will talk about assuring it is being taught to all students. 

📚 Read:
@Mr_Crome's recent blog post on thriving teams. There is loads of great content in the whole series of blog posts Sam has done on Thriving teams, his most recent post on debriefs is another great one. He talks about why they are important and how to lead a team debrief. Have a read here.

📚 Read:
David Perrells twitter thread on why writing online can accelerate your career. I would definitely recommend everyone to start writing and David brilliantly summarises why and how it can help. Read it here

📚 Read: 
Mr Gordons blog post on Quality assurance and how it can be done collaboratively. Taken loads from this in quality assuring our curriculum. Well worth a read

Popular posts from this blog

📝 Weekly Report #21

The trainee teacher in our department has started to teach my Year 10 group this week. It has taken me back to when I was training and the struggles that I had and the feedback my mentor would give me. One thing I didn't consider back then was how the class teacher feels who I was taking over from.  I know that as a trainee I was no where near being an amazing teacher but over time I have continually improved. So it has been a struggle for me to allow the trainee to teach my class thinking that there would be aspects that I know I could deliver much better. On the flip side of this it has been great to learn from him by watching him teach and being able to give small steps to improve for next time. The initial focus has been on general pedagogy, e.g. use of questioning, planning for misconceptions etc. It's made me reflect on my own teaching ensuring I don't just talk it, I walk the walk too! I've also enjoyed seeing the improvements he has been able to make lesson on l...

📝 Weekly Report #7

👨‍🏫 Teaching: Colin Hegarty has recently been posting questions from Sparx and discussing which questions are better to use and why. Check out some of his tweets here . It got me thinking about the questions and examples I use in my own teaching, in particular around the numbers I choose to use. It highlights the need to carefully craft questions to pull out misconceptions and ensure students are learning the concept correctly rather than getting to the answer by chance. Unfortunately time is precious and so it is very difficult to do this for every question in every lesson I teach. Having said that, I have made a conscious effort to ensure the examples I am using are there on purpose and can be used to highlight key concepts so students can generalise ideas more easily. Will definitely look into this more as part of my NCETM course throughout the year. Definitely given me lots to think about to improve my teaching.  🔊 Listen: High performance podcast with Mark Cavendish. Mark t...

Ratio Tables: Why you need to use them?

Only 36% of students were able to answer the question on the right. Whereas 75% of students were able to correctly answer the problem on the left. (7) Why? What's the big difference?  Students are more likely to relate values between objects (left question) than within an object (right question). (7) A similar issue comes up in the questions below. 91% getting the bottom question correct, relating 11 people to 33 people. Whereas only 51% answered the top question correctly.  Students often struggle to see all of the multiplicative links between and within values. One of the misconceptions my own students had with the right 'L' question was that the answer was 45. They had added 13cm because 8 + 13 = 21 on the base of the 'L'. "Young children tend to see multiplication additively" Dietmar Kuchemann   DfE suggests teaching multiplication as repeated addition, with arrays, in Yr2. Yr3 scaling is introduced but after that isn't mentioned again. It is as...